Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 126:11

בשלמא למאן דאמר חד בגנב וחד בטוען טענת גנב היינו דכתיבי תרי קראי אלא למאן דאמר תרוייהו בטוען טענת גנב תרי קראי למה לי

stated<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That he became dispossessed of it by the thief. ');">¹⁸</span> but that he himself had stolen it, he has to pay double. But whence can we conclude that this is so only in the case of an oath [having been falsely taken by the bailee]? — As it was taught: The master of the house shall come near unto the judges<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXII, 7. ');">¹³</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 126:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.